Saturday, May 27, 2017

- Context And Cowardice

I’ve been thinking about context a lot lately. Context is very important. Just think about the simple phrase “Are you allright?” Imagine a man saying it to another man. The next thing you probably imagine is a burning building, overturned car, or incoming projectiles of copper and lead.

Now imagine a woman saying it to another woman. What is the next thing you imagine? Is it a woman sitting alone on a bed with her head in her hands and crying? Maybe she’s in a hospital waiting room or a church pew. Wherever she is, the next thing you expect from each of these circumstance is very different.

For the men, you expect the questioned man to check his own vitals or for the existence of his limbs. Maybe he’ll pat his own body or pull the Velcro on his body armor to see if he has a hole or just a world class welt or maybe a broken rib.

For the woman wherever you imagine her, the next thing you expect is to hear about how she feels about herself.

There is a biological imperative for this. Women are supposed to be this way. It’s natural for them. It doesn’t make them bad women, it only makes them bad men. They are genetically wired to worry more about their own survival than the survival of those around them because their biology invests them in then next generation of humans. And if you’re going to worry about the future rather than the present, then you need to be more defensive.

Men aren’t like that. Men worry about the present. And I don’t mean just today, I mean the right now… the right this second. Men are less vested in the future than women because the future requires less of them. A momentary investment from men can assure an entire new generation of humans. And this makes them disposable.

But if the natural order gets overturned somehow, all sorts of things start to fall apart. If men worry more about their future than the present, they become cowards. They run when they should fight, and that puts everyone at risk. We’re not terribly strong or sturdy individually, but we’re organized and cohesive. That’s what makes humans the most dangerous animal on the planet.

And if women worry more about their present than their future, then in very short order, there is no future. Women have a very short reproductive window compared to men. The big investment than nature requires from them for creating the next generation means that they have to get to it earlier than men. A 40 year old man has nearly the same reproductive odds as a 17 year old man. But for a woman, when she reaches 40 her reproductive odds are on average, just 2% of what they were in her reproductive prime.

So when women spend age 20 to 40 worried about their present – their career, their personal fulfillment, ‘sowing their wild oats’ like the much more disposable men often do, the system breaks down. And that makes them just as disposable. Which is what men of the west are doing with them now. They’re disposing them.

The disposable women don’t realize this until they reach 40, because when you ask a woman if she’s allright, she only ever thinks about herself, and her feelings about herself. This is tragically natural for them. It’s how nature designed them. But speaking as a man, I have a much more important question for you.

What conceivable excuse could all those cowardly men have?

Our culture is falling apart and the truth of it is that it's men's fault. And only men can save it.

Friday, May 26, 2017

- Safer With Sikhs Around

I don't know how much you know about Sikhs, an indian minority group - who are neither Muslim, nor Hindu exactly, but more closely related to the Hindu faith. I personally think of them as a kind of Hindu - Mormon.

The Mormon church isn't what anyone would call a 'typical' Christian faith. They have some wacky ideas to my Catholic eyes and some interesting takes on convention. But I don't think anyone would believe they are closer to Judaism or Islam than Christianity. They are a Christian faith, for what it's worth. And I've liked every single Mormon I've ever met.

Anyway, the Sikhs are kind of like that, only for Hiduism. Which isn't to say that there is any direct relationship between Mormons and Sikhs, except that they are both major subdivisions of one of the world's largest faiths.

I've had the pleasure of working with a few Sikhs over the years in various positions. And like the Mormons I've met, I've enjoyed every minute of that as well. I think it's mainly because the Sikh's are such total bad-asses. For example, being armed to protect the rights and safety of others is a tenet of their faith. It's a rule. Look it up.

One Sikh friend of mine in New York city went to fairly extraordinary lengths to stay true to that, because as you know, being armed in New York is expressly illegal - even if your god says otherwise. I won't tell you how he resolved it except to say that if it ever comes to it, it's probably considered a grey area.

But more than that, my experience has been that they have a very modest and unassuming nature to them. That's not the kind of thing you expect from a guy who carries a dagger around 24-7 but it's true of all sikhs. They fear no man. Courage for them is a matter of personal pride and being thought of as a coward, makes you less in the eyes of god. But you don't have to be a dick about it.

What's not to like?

Anyway there is this story in the Ace overnight thread, about a sikh cab driver in Manchester who offered Free rides to help out, and Cosmo (the chick Magazine) reported that he was a 'Muslim' cab driver. How can you tell someone at Cosmo is typing a lie? They're keyboard is making that clickety clack sound. But in this specific case, the Turban is the tipoff.

Muslim's don't wear turbans except as a fashion statement. Hindus aren't required to do so either (at least I don't think they are.) But Sikh's are. so when you see the south asian guy wearing a turban, a bracelet on his wrist (Usually copper in my experience) and looking like he's packing, fear not. You're safer with him around than you would be if he weren't.

And let me chime in on the Ace guys and say "Fuck you Cosmo."

- The Rise of a Super Villain (Part Three)

Seriously - this guy is a sociopath.

- An Amazing Admission

From Unz Review (of course) I just this moment read the following sentence from a card carrying member of the intellectual left:

First, it seems to be a fact that the genuinely intellectual wings of the alt-right or neo-reaction (NRx) or whatever you want to call it, are probably too intelligent and sophisticated for bourgeois intellectual workers to engage with, let alone compete with. … So if those essays are actually pretty smart and a legitimate challenge to your institutional authority as a credentialed intellectual—you are functionally required to close ranks, if only with a silent agreement to not engage.

Speaking from personal experience, I'd say this is almost certainly correct. And I'm not even talking about 'half-measure' guys like Charles Murray, who concede the moral ground to the left, but argue the minutiae.Look at Derbyshire, Brimelow, Jared Taylor, Steve Sailer. Show me the leftist who can even keep up with them let alone offer a logically consistent intellectual argument to refute what they say.

In the world there are facts. Facts are inescapable. Gravity doesn't care how you feel about it. Then there are ideas, which may in the fullness of time prove to be facts when their supporting evidence becomes so well known or inexpensive to learn, that they ean that status. This is the intellectual border of the objective world.

Then there are opinions. Opinions are not facts, and never will be facts. Opinions are a subjective reflection of facts. They're conjecture, or assumption. But they are not facts, and a fair number of them (I'd say 50% but that's slightly unfair) will turn out to be simply wrong.

Then there are feelings. Feelings are something we all possess but none of us truly ever share because they are purely subjective. They are in many cases, how the facts and ideas of the world make us feel about ourselves. But whatever their basis, every aspect of them except their existence, is mutually exclusive from the world of facts.

The intellectual left has retreated from the world of facts, and now tries to make the claim that there is no world outside the subjective. They deny it, in whole and in part. They view it as an abomination of the religion of the ego, to which they all strictly adhere. To them, even pointing to anything which challenges the ego of the subjectivists in the tiniest way, is to be guilty of a great moral sin. And it doesn't matter if the fact is as inescapable as gravity, if you notice it, you are considered, not wrong - anyone can be wrong - you're considered evil.

And you can't imagine how pleased it makes me to know that there is at least one apostate in their midst.

Thursday, May 25, 2017

- Behold Feminism's Future Demise

I was almost not going to post this because I was so pleased with the outcome of my last 'stream of consciousness' piece. But it's really too much fun not to share. What we have here, explained with the typical serious intellectual clarity of my favorite Canadian academic Janice Fiomengo, is a detailed description of the snake of Feminism, finally turning on itself, and devouring it's own tail.

And when the academics all turn on each other, as Janice ever so clearly explains they have, the rest of the mindless drones can't be far behind. In no time they'll all be locked in their bedroom closets in the Fetal position, and the rest of us can get on with the serious business of being civilized men and women.

The long night of excess obviously isn't over just yet, but I think you can see the end of it from here.

- We Are The Problem: Part 87,462,837

Ask soldiers why they risk their lives, and once you get past the political platitudes about god, country and family, you get to the truth of it. They risk their lives not for high minded ideals, though that's a part of it. The reason they really risk their lives, is for the men standing beside them.

Did you feel that? did you feel that surge in you when you read those words? That's exactly what I'm talking about. Maybe you've felt that on a football field or basketball court. Maybe you've felt it with your friends or brothers. But you need to feel it again now. We are all men, we're all in this together. And though we didn't ask for it, we're engaged in a life or death struggle with an enemy that wants us as their slaves or dead.

My brother was a soldier during peacetime, or at least during a war slightly colder than the ones we’re in now. He was stationed near the Czech border in West Germany, where they could see Soviet bloc Troops on the other side. He fired no shots in combat, and had no shots fired at him. The worst thing he sent toward the enemy was insults in German. But even now, decades later, he occasionally talks about the grip that his connection to his squad mates still has on him.

This is the nature of how men connect to other men. Most of the time we compete. My brother and I are only 11 months apart and spent our entire childhood competing. He was better at some things and I was better at others. But all that competition with its wins and losses, didn’t put any obstacle between us. Now, with both of us in middle age, we’re closer than we’ve ever been. And he’s literally walking around with my blood in his veins.

Men don’t usually get together in big groups to get behind big political ideas. And it’s a good thing too because if there were ever a men’s march on Washington the size of the recent women’s march, with it’s stupid vagina hats and dedications to Sharia law, the Congress would probably call out the National Guard. And they’d be right to do so, because if men ever get so angry that a group that size forms, we’ll be getting together to burn the halls of government to the ground. And as my brother said once it's other men who are driving the tanks, and ‘he can only imagine the look of shock and horror on their face when that tank turret spins around to point in the other direction’.

But they don’t have to worry about that, because men don’t feel big kinships the way women do. We feel small ones. Personal ones. We feel a connection to men who we can look in the eyes and see the connection. The same dedication to principle. The same love. That’s how we connect. Personally.

But we need to do something different now.

There is much talk in my normal reading list about the differences between races. Yes, race is a real thing. But I’ve got to confess, I have always felt more of similarity and kinship to a black man than I ever have to a any woman. (Even my daughter who I'd kill and die for, is a very different kind of animal than me.) I've felt that connection, particularly with black men of a certain age who have matured beyond the stage where adolescent volatility is still an issue. Treat a more mature black man with the kind of courtesy and respect you’d like to see from him, and my experience is that he’ll always respond positively to it. He is a man after all, and it’s how all men are wired. Personal connection is always possible whatever the differences.

And that’s the lesson I think we should be taking from all this business in Manchester. We men need to begin to appreciate just how far down the Feminist rabbit hole we’ve all been dragged by our libidos, and start thinking again like men. We need to start removing the Feminist mindset from our society and our halls of government. We need to discard their pettiness and frivolity. ‘Coming together in Love’ will not defeat our enemies. Only violence will defeat our enemies. Harsh and rigid male logic and reason is the order of the day, not the silly soft apologies and social media virtue signaling of women. We’ve tried that. It’s failed. It’s now time to do something more serious. It’s time to solve this the male way.

Women don’t respect men who don’t stand up to them. This is the nature of the $4it test’. It’s time for men to realize that all of Feminism is really just a collective $4it test’. It’s a test we can only pass if we ‘fail’. It’s time to tell the Feminists to shut up, go home, and let the men handle it. It’s time to tell them that having to ‘wash bits of 8 year old girls out of our hair’ is too big a price to pay for political correctness. The only other inevitable choice, is ceasing to exist.

There is no need for cruelty here. Women are silly and superfluous, and should never be allowed to make big decisions on their own. But that doesn’t make them unnecessary. Let them ramble on about Ivanka and Melania's hair-styles and how important it is to let transexuals in bathrooms.

We should listen politely to all their wailing and teeth gnashing, then ignore every word they say. Until very recently, this is what men have always done with women. And in a time of crisis like this one, it's always the right thing to do. This is wired into our Y chromosome. You felt it just a moment ago. If you're honest with yourself, you can probably feel it right now. The problem isn't them. They'll always be women. The problem is us.

It’s well past time for men, to start acting like men again. All of us.

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

- Save Our History - June 10th - SJWs Going to Texas to Protest Sam Houston?

To anti-american SJW scum: watch the video above. The narrator speaks real slow and there are large subtitles. Let it sink in as to why you are protesting for the removal of Sam Houston's Statue.
So if Antifa or anyone else wants to mess with Texas... I'll bring the popcorn.
If you get past the Proud Boys, you'll be confronted by OathKeepers. Or a motley assembly of Americans sick and tired of your bullshit! Yeah the same folks that ran you out of your Safe Space in Berkeley...
If that ain't enough... you will be greeted by one of the many Texas Volunteer Militia's
Best Wishes!

- Louise Mensch: Alt-Right Recruiter

From Vox's site:

To all my dear Muslim brothers and sisters in Manchester and across the U.K., we got your back. Neither terrorists nor Nazis will divide us.

Vox's reaction is similar to my own:

I put a poll up on Twitter.

If a Muslim happens to drive a truck through the Manchester vigil tonight, what would be the correct response?
Laugh
Cry
Hold another vigil
Pray to St. Breivik

St. Breivik is a reference to the Norwegian Shooter who took an Assault rifle to a Progressive Summer camp and killed 69 people. He's a self describe 'Fascist' and 'National Socialist'. From his wikipedia page:

On the day of the attacks, Breivik electronically distributed a compendium of texts entitled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, describing his militant ideology. In them, he lays out a worldview encompassing opposition to Islam and blaming feminism for creating a European "cultural suicide". The texts call Islam and Cultural Marxism the enemy and advocate the deportation of all Muslims from Europe based on the model of the BeneŇ° decrees, while also claiming that feminism exists to destroy European culture.

Vox has a pretty good defense of of his citing Breivik, and I'll let it speak for itself. In this context though I read him to mean that the only answer to a people who want to blow up innocent little girls is violence. Though I'm not advocating shooting up a summer camp or college campus, I can definitely see his point.

I believe the government should be the only arbiter of force. I don't think it should be necessary for individuals in a country with a functioning government, to resort to force on their own behalf, in order to protect innocent children.

The question I have is, is the UK, or for that matter the US, that kind of country? Or are we already as ungovernable as Louise Mensch and the Social Justice Warriors say that they want us to be?

And what do we do about it if we are?

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

- Fashionably Hating Western Culture

Social Justice Warriors hate western traditions and the institutions that grew out of them. They want to smash it all and replace with their own neo-marxist values. They invest a great deal of time, energy and money trying to convince us that despising the west and all it stands for is the only legitimate moral choice.

Radical Muslim terrorists also hate western traditions and the institutions that grew out of them. They too want to smash it all and replace it with their own values. They invest a great deal of time, energy, and money trying to convince us that despising the west and all it stands for is the only legitimate moral choice.

So when Salman Abedi, 23, a British man of Syrian heritage was thinking about blowing up a stadium full of children, all he sees wherever he looks are people who feel exactly the same way about the west that he does, but just don't have the courage to do something about it.

But I'm sure that's all just a coincidence.