Saturday, June 25, 2011

I've Decided To Break The Law



All the concealed carry permits that NJ has issued in the last 25 years (to non law enforcement officers) can be counted on a single hand, and you'd still have enough fingers left to not have to worry about spilling your drink. While the rest of the country has been bringing their firearms laws in line with the latest crime data and in sync with the voting public, NJ is still right on the cutting edge of the 1970's. But it's where I live - so that, as they say, is that.

When friends have asked me in the past, I always told them that if I felt the need to carry a firearm then I'd simply carry one and the law be damned. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. But as it stands, my primary pistol is a Beretta PX4 in .45 caliber. It's a full sized gun. I can carry it concealed with the right holster, (and I have the right holster). But while most people won't see it, any policeman certainly will. They know what to look for and it's simply too big to hide completely.

With that said, and with NJ's firearms laws unlikely to change soon (Christie remains fervently anti-gun) I've decided that the situation outside is getting serious enough now for me to be prepared to carry on occasion. Crime is soaring, especially violent crime. And with Greece due to default on July 15, and the US at least possibly to follow on August 2nd, we're getting a little too close to the edge for me. I have no intention of becoming a crime victim simply because NJ want's to keep Carter Era regulations in place.

So I've decided to buy myself a little pocket pistol; the kind of thing that you can put in a wallet holster and no one will ever know it's there. They are small, thin, light, and completely concealable. They typically will deliver 7 shots of 380 (9mm short) ammo, which is considered the minimum by many in terms of 'stopping power'. And they are designed for use at the kind of 'up close' distances that crime usually happens.

That isn't to say they can't shoot at a distance too. The model I have in mind is the Ruger LCP (pictured above), which is the same weapon that Texas governor Rick Perry shot and killed a Coyote with last year when it came upon him while jogging. And the gun boards are alight with exclamation of how accurate a weapon it the little Ruger is.

The law doesn't allow me to protect myself. If I carry a concealed firearm and I'm caught with it, it will mean years in jail for me. But at this point things are looking like they're getting risky enough that I don't think that should stop me. In effect, I've decided to break the law. So if you see me in transit someplace, there is at least a chance that I'll be armed when you do.

I won't carry everyday. In this neck of the woods it's simply too risky. There are random DUI roadblocks, spontaneous subway searches, and every time you turn around there is a new building with a metal detector. But if I think the need is there, then my new pistol is going to be too. If the cops are coming for one and the coroner for the other, I know which one I'd rather be.

%%%%%%%%%%%%UPDATE%%%%%%%%%%%%


Mrs. RFNJ objected pretty strenuously to this blog post. She has no problem with me carrying a concealed weapon; I wouldn't seriously consider it unless she was willing to sign off on the idea. But she has a big problem with me announcing my intention to do so. She survived communism you see, where you can be arrested for the suspicion of having seditious thoughts. And apart from the scars she still carries from her experience, she's also a very private person by nature.

I tried to explain to her that announcing my intention to do something is not the same as actually doing it. I can't be arrested for saying that I'm going to rob a bank... I have to actually rob it first (or at least take concrete steps in that direction). And I tried to explain that if I were to use a concealed weapon to defend myself, that I had carried it would become a foregone conclusion and the fact that I had announced my intention first would be the least of my problems. She understood all that, but she had a purely emotional reaction to the idea.

"If it's going to be a concealed weapon" she said when we were arguing about it, "then conceal it."

She has a point. But I'm weighing that against the potential benefit of talking about it. The idea of this blog is to add another straw to the camel's back of injustice. NJ's gun laws are profoundly unjust. So much so that even someone like me, a law abiding citizen by any measure, has to seriously consider breaking the law in order to keep himself safe. And a law that perfectly law abiding citizens feel they have no choice but to violate, is a law that should be changed.

But for the record though, and to ensure my domestic harmony let me say this. I'm buying the gun. The gun is designed for concealed carry, but that doesn't mean I have to use it that way. Maybe after I get the gun in my safe I'll come to the conclusion that I don't actually have to carry it after all. Maybe just having it close enough to carry will mean that I never have to. I'd always rather obey the law if I can. And things will have to get pretty hairy out there before I'm willing to risk a felony conviction.

I already have a pistol that I can conceal, and I don't ever carry it. In fact, the only time I've ever worn it in the holster was at a range - in order to practice with it a little. So I've really risked nothing by making this public. But if the risks change, then I want to retain the ability to change how I react to them... nothing more.

That's my story, and I'm sticking with it.

14 comments:

James Bond said...

Good for you. As we all know, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away. And the Supreme Court said in 1985 that we have no right to police protection.

JD said...

Good luck. BTW I love your blog.

Anonymous said...

Don't be surprised at how unpleasant the Little Crappy Pistol can be to shoot. That said, it sure is easy to carry. I had several failures to extract that went away after a couple hundred rounds of smoothing out.

Anonymous said...

SIr: I have been reading Radio Free New Jersey for something like the last eight months and enjoy it immensely. I was raised in NJ (10 years) and in 2008 wound up working back there on a detail as a federal law enforcement officer. My duty station is on the west coast. I can tell you that the LEO's I worked with in NJ (federal) were nervous carrying their side arms off duty and many felt it was easier to just leave the gun at home. I was shocked. Coming from the rural mountainous west, NJ felt to me, like a police state. American citizens shouldn't have to have a badge to carry a sidearm. I wish you the best of luck in what must be a very painful dilemma and would urge you to get the hell out of Jersey.

Tom said...

Looks like I have to stack up my responses:

To the first Anonymous:

I've had some experience shooting the little 380's and I agree they aren't fun. Just goes to show you how well gun weight will cut down recoil.

With that said, though - I have one friend who has actually had to shoot someone in a self defense situation. He used a Bersa 380 which although marginally better than the LCP, can still be a little snappy. He now says that he didn't notice the recoil at all, but it was still an unpleasant experience in a bunch of new ways.

If I'm alive to complain about it - overall I'll call it a win.

To the second Anonymous:

I'm a law abiding citizen. I'm a prosperous, married, mid 40's, suburban, professional with lots to lose. I make my living honestly, and since my wife is a CPA, we don't even lie on our taxes. We are the kind of people who play by the rules. If anything, we’re on the boring side. Except for traffic issues, I can’t remember the last time I broke a law – even a silly or arbitrary one. A wild night for me is splitting a bottle of wine 4 ways in my backyard, and even that is a rarity. I don’t keep any alcohol in my house at all, and I even had the same bottle of beer sit in my refrigerator once for 4 years.

In any other state, I’m precisely the kind of guy who most LEO’s would consider a good candidate for a concealed carry permit. I’m a stabilizing influence, not a wildcard. I don’t get in shouting matches in the bleachers. I know how to see a problem coming and how to avoid it. And I’ll continue to do that – maybe even more so if I’m carrying. At its best, firing a shot in self defense will involve tens of thousands in legal fee and years taken out of my life. So I’m absolutely aware of the price to be paid either way, and of course, I’d rather simply cross the street than face that.

What’s worse, the talk in the ‘firearms community’ here in NJ is that if you fire a shot, you will be charged with (and almost certainly convicted of) a crime. A criminal could be in your home, wearing no pants, with your adolescent child stripped naked and tied up at his feet, shotgun in his hands. And even if he turns out to be a two time felon with a history of home invasion, rape, and murder, when you shoot him, you will be charged with unlawful discharge of a firearm, and maybe criminal possession of the same (even if you bought your gun legally). That’s the way it is in NJ. You are required by law to be a passive victim. There is no ‘justice’, only the law.

Normally this wouldn’t concern me. There is very little crime in my sleepy suburban town. But every day things get worse. And with the entire economy of the western world teetering on the brink, I know that we’re just a breath away from utter mayhem. I don’t want to be trapped in NYC when it finally hits the fan, and have to find my way back to my home without the means to defend myself.

To get back and forth to Manhattan, I have to cross Jersey City, Newark, Elizabeth and Perth Amboy. All have more than enough crime and violence right now to give a reasonable man pause. If the US defaults, that area could become a genuine war zone. In my professional opinion, the odds are high enough that it’s time for me to buy insurance against it. Positive self defense is a part of that insurance.

With a little luck, no one will ever know (if or when) I’m carrying. That’s my goal anyway. And if a miracle occurs and the state begins issuing CC Permits, I’ll be first in line.

Blegoo said...

Sir:
I have to agree strongly with Mrs. RFNJ.
Having survived the same type of sociopolitical environment, I say to you:
Don't advertise your desire for survival, just act upon it.

JD said...

Good walkback on the original post. And remember concealed mans concealed. If you're doing it right you have gone a long way towards meeting your needs.

Anonymous said...

You really think things'll be heading south that quickly?

During the Great Depression, crime fell, didn't it?

Anonymous said...

Tom:
Great feedback and I love your passion. I would also say that Blegoo offers some sound advice. I recommend Nova's "American Apocalypse" for one entertaining end times scenario. Whether it goes down quickly by default, no pun intended, or slowly as jobs, currencies and natural resources are frittered away, NYC and its immediate environs are no place to be. That so many of us foresee the potential of an "orgy of violence" makes me think... well damn, we're probably going to see an orgy of violence. Best you keep a bailout bag along with that sidearm of yours containing MRE's, H2O, some silver coins and comfortable walking shoes. I'll hazard a guess that you won't be driving across those tunnels and bridges if the markets implode. Thanks for the heartfelt post and keeping it open for comment. - Second Anonymous

Tom said...

Actually, I'm not expecting an 'orgy of violence' at all. I'm expecting rolling blackouts. I'm expecting local supply problems and maybe eventually a food riot (but nothing that spreads). I’m expecting skyrocketing crime as those that depend on the government for everything come to the realization that it wasn’t’ such a great idea. I'm imagining Newark becoming more like a Mexican border town rather than the Mexican border towns becoming more like Newark.

And as I've written dozens of times now, I don't think we'll be going to a 'thunderdome' kind of scenario. I think the people who feel that have been watching too many movies.

But municipalities are already cutting police. And if inflation gets out of hand then the police we have won't be able to survive on what we pay them. That doesn't make for the most motivated law enforcement, and criminals will make the most of that. As for the economic causality - it's not the event that crates the problem; it's what the government does in reaction to it. So no one is going to have to worry about surviving on MRE and cowering under a space blanket while they desperately try to shoot their way back from NYC to their house in the suburbs.

That's not how the world works. That’s how Hollywood works.

Try reading this to get a better look at my view of how you survive a REAL crisis, and the way that fantasy has crept in to most people’s views on how things will go:

http://freenj.blogspot.com/2010/10/american-self-reliance.html

It’s my view of course. And when they set you and I against each other in the thunderdome you’ll certainly be able to say ‘I told you so’. And in fairness, I promise to concede the point sometime before we both go lunging for the chainsaw.

But with more than two decades watching economies fall apart and improve, I’m betting against it.

Matt H said...

I sometimes carry a LC9 in a SmartCarry/Thunderwear type holster. The thing to watch out for is rust. Those little Rugers don't have a high-end protective finish like we're used to on Glocks, S&W M&Ps and the like. It's just standard blueing. I wish they would come out with a stainless version or a Tenifer/Melonite type finish. I'd gladly pay $50 extra for that because the kind of deep concealment for which these guns are made means they often end up in sweaty environments. It helps to wipe down the slide with a little bit of gun oil each day. That said, I still think you're on the right track with the Ruger. It's hard to beat the size, price, and build quality.

Blegoo said...

I don't think anyone is seriously considering any Mad Max or Escape from NY type of situation.
Still, recent crime headlines coming from Chicagostan are compelling, to put it mildly.

By all means, CC if you must, legally or not - just don't advertise.

To make a public declaration of such looks to me as equal to carry a sign proclaiming "armed and dangerous". Law enforcement personnel will follow you like a hungry dog chasing a truck carrying polish sausages.

After all... the criminals don't advertise; why should you?

Tom said...

Clearly Blegoo, you and my wife are cut from the same type of cloth.

Point taken.

Blegoo said...

When under attack by superior forces... run!
When under fire... duck!
When in doubt... listen to the woman of the house.
:)