Thursday, April 5, 2012

- The "Investor Class" Voters



This post is treading a little close to my professional bailiwick, so forgive me if I seem vague or don't respond to comments. But I wanted to talk about the chart above - the Equity Mutual Fund Flows chart.

This is generally believed to be a good reflection of the behavior of the retail investor. My proprietary data derived from a completely different source agrees with that. And what this chart (which I clipped from this piece at Zerohedge) indicates is that while the market continues to rise, it's doing it without retail capital.

The reason for this is not that the retail investor is prescient about the summer collapse of equities (although I don't specifically rule it out). But if this really were the cliff's edge, you'd expect at least some retail participation. Retail has a long history of buying at the top, selling at the bottom, and only making money in the market because of the risk premium for being long - and their exceptionally long holding period.

Besides, I think if things sell off for any meaningful macro-economic reason then the Fed will certainly bring in more QE to shore up the market. And I think that will continue to define the big moves for a little while longer at least. So this chart doesn't say much about the market's future. But I think it does say something important about American politics.

I know a number of investment professionals who are very worried about this rally because they believe it will allow Obama to eek out reelection. They think a rising market increases the wealth effect, gets people feeling better, and by that, lets the most economically illiterate President since Roosevelt cling white knuckled to his office for 4 more years. But because of what this chart says, I disagree.

I think the investor class believes that Obama's reelection would be highly damaging to the economy, and since the election isn't settled business, it's increasing their skepticism in the rally. This is the main reason why I think they aren't participating at this point, as almost everyone would expect them to.

Also, I think if Obama tries to take credit for the run-up in equity markets to make the most of that 'wealth effect', they either won't believe it or won't care. It's like listening to him talk about an 'all of the above' energy strategy. We know he doesn't really mean it. So even if we level off for the summer months into the autumn and don't have a serious downdraft, it's not going to be a viable selling point for him.

This means that if his reelection prospects start to diminish coming into August and September, we'll begin to see retail participation in the market. They'll treat it as a 'risk on' event, and the assets controlled by retail investors (in aggregate) dwarfs the 'faster money' in the hedge fund and banking world. It won't take much to totally overwhelm the hedge fund cash. At that point, we may see a substantial 'updraft' even if fundamentals don't look better in any way.

And once the election is settled business, as their accountant and investment managers begin to report their relative under performance, we'll see even further 'risk on' behavior going into Q4 2012 and Q1 of 2013.

I still believe Obama can't get reelected. He has no track record to run on, unemployment is still problematically high (and won't improve in time), and his ratings fall dramatically every time he goes on TV. The seas have not been calmed so his base is disillusioned (as was inevitably given his outsized promises to them). And if the retail investor believed in this rally enough for him to use it as a selling point, they'd be a bigger part of it already.

I don't think he can hide from the voters like he did last time - like leftist always have to do. And I think his every step makes him look more divisive, and dangerous.

And because of this chart, I think a great many people agree with me.

7 comments:

ikaika said...

While you don't believe he could get re-elected - and he has a horrible track record, Romney can hand him the election if he's not careful.

Its a unique equity market since very few people are making money in this environment.

You can't extract the real-estate nightmare from the package and most retail money is still licking their woulnds from RE collapse.

If you follow Europe like I do, we are a long way from out of the woods.

The major European Equity indices are being drawn down by Spain, Italy and then France - like dominoes.

We have triple-tops on both the INDU and the S&P 500.

Our Equity markets are the last set of dominoes.

Tom said...

Nothing is so certain that it can't be screwed up by a Republican politician, and the press will be pouring over his every eyelash flicker in an attempt to find evidence of racism, sexism, and various other liberal sins.

But he's made relatively few mistakes in the primary. Being bland won't be enough to blow it.

As for Europe, I agree they're screwed. Their entire social contract is invalid - but so long as Obama doesn't get re-elected that doesn't apply to us.


Ours is the far more dynamic economy so I think we're ahead of them not behind. We're the first domino not the last.

ikaika said...

We used to have a very dynamic economy, but bernanke has inextricably linked us to the fate of the Euro. The taxpayers will be suckered into laundering bad Euro debt.

If Spain and Portugal go flat-line, that knocks out a huge gird in global banking - reminds me I must take an inventory of all the Santander and BES offices in the US.

Obama will take credit for rise in Equities as a result of regulation, but like I said, most of the O voters have either lost their savings in Real Estate or couldn't participate in the equity markets.

The Unions and State Employees will see their portfolios return to agreeable levels, but it won't be enough to influence the gen pop that Obama is fixing things in their favor.

frithguild said...

The flows show an interesting correlation - for example as confirmation of the head and shoulders fro Feb to May 10. However, the chart seems to decouple first in April-May 11 and in December 11. Maybe if I had time I would scan the news to look for the psychology to explain this ...

chess said...

i think ikaika has it right. the O voters arent in this market and they want their free stuff from odumass. and theyl get it... till i see different the O will win by 51 49.. if there is a hint of romney doin something then long market and really long banks and natgas producers... but i dont think ill have to worry b out that for at least fomo yrs

Hell_Is_Like_Newark said...

I see one wildcard / potential black swan event that could make things very messy on the energy front:

There is a lot of oil being produced, but it's not getting to market for two reasons:

1. Speculation: A lot of oil is sitting in salt domes, tankers, and tank farms because the current regime sure is not doing anything to make people think the price is going down anytime soon. So there is not incentive to put that oil on the market.

2. Lack of transport: Where oil sits under private land (public land oil production continues to crater thanks to Obama & Co.), it is not getting to market. There is not enough pipeline capacity.. or the pipelines simply don't exist. This is one reason why West Texas Intermediate is at a discount compared to Brent Crude. Even if its cheaper, refineries can't get their hands on it.

The latter is causing a big down-tick in our refining capacity, on the Atlantic side. Refineries are being shut down in the Caribbean and possibly soon on the East coat of the USA. Reason? They are forced to use more expensive Brent Crude. When you add on the transportation costs of shipping it from the Mid East, the margins go negative. Once those refineries are idled, they can't be turned back on overnight.

Add on to the fact that Obama has been emptying the Strategic Oil Reserve, which is supposed to be for really serious shortages (IMO.. Wartime use). Are situation is even more fragile.

If we get an event that disrupts the flow of Brent Crude, I think we could see $6 to $8 gas with 1970's style shortages.

The United States could survive this regardless. Europe, with its economic glass jaw? No so much..

If this happens, Obama will definitely, cashiered come November. What will it mean for the markets? Blood on the streets?

frithguild said...

The first decouple is Fukushima - not so much a decoupling, as the movements go out of phase. The next, more of a decoupling, seems to coincide with the end of 2011 ...