I'm not sure what Eduardo's tax liability is, at this point probably no one is absolutely certain. But I do know for certain that ABC news has gotten the story wrong. US citizens are already liable for taxes on their income for 10 years after the surrender their citizenship. Any skilled tax attorney can tell you that - and Eduardo's people certainly know it. So there is nothing new in that specific area about Chuck Schumer's newly proposed tax tantrum. What is different is that Schumer's bill will prevent Eduardo from returning to the US.His lawyers would certainly know better than me, but I suspect Eduardo is making the claim that since he already had joint citizenship with Brazil, it was as a Brazilian citizen that he did his work with Facebook. And if that's their claim, then I suppose they can make the further claim that he isn't liable for the punitive tax that comes after his citizenship is renounced.
I don't know, I'm not a tax lawyer, but it seems like it might be do-able if you have the kind of money it would take to fight the battle in tax court - and he certainly does.
As I said, US citizens are liable for taxes on income for 10 year after surrendering their citizenship, unless they surrender their citizenship "specifically" to avoid taxes. Then it's viewed as tax evasion and you go to prison. I wrote all this up here, when I was researching a similar move myself. But this is cap-gains not income, and Eduardo is a Brazilian citizen (at least partly) so I guess his people think he can make a fight of it. They'll probably settle with the government for a portion of what they think they're owed.
But I guess that isn't enough for Chuck Schumer. He wants anyone who has done something as evil and reprehensible as "Founding Facebook" to be punished more aggressively than that. That Chucky is a real piece of work, but at least when it comes to capitalism (and gun rights, and protecting the border, and a dozen other issues) you know where he stands. He's the kind of politician who would make a great totalitarian dictator.
%%%%%%%%%%UPDATE%%%%%%%%%%
The moral case here is pretty clear, and the Liberals have gotten it wrong again. If you read the ABC news comments you'll see that people support Eduardo's move by (my rough count) about 25 to 1. Those that don't are under the impression that Eduardo made his money at the expense of Americans, and he should therefore be forced to pay whatever the Americans want. This is an idiotic position, and is not how Economics works in the real world.
Which probably explains why people overwhelmingly support his move to limit his tax liability. They would all do it themselves if they could. Americans don't hate the rich, they want to be the rich. And if they get there, they don't want Chuck Schumer picking their pocket from 12,000 miles away.
All this really does is expose a little more of what the liberal mindset really is. It's an immoral code, based on envy, greed, the lust for power, and the desire to control other people's lives. You can do anything you want under liberalism, so long as it's no better than anyone else. If you do, you become a target like Eduardo Saverin.
Under the Democrats it's "From each according to the demands of the government, to each according to the way they vote, their race, gender, and whether they represent a key electoral demographic in a carefully selected swing state, or have acted as a bundler for the campaign."
Chuck Schumer is an immoral man. I just wish he wasn't so shameless about it.
%%%%%%%%%% UPDATE #2 %%%%%%%%%%
Since Schumer and his fellow Democrats are so determined to make this into a country where we put up walls to keep people in, I thought this might be a good time to remind everyone that we in NJ have our own "Exit Tax" as well. It's collected as a percentage of the gain on the home you sell in NJ. If you're a full time resident you can then claim it on your state tax return and get it back, but if you're moving out of state, they just keep it.
So Jim McGreevy and the NJ Democratic legislators actually beat Schumer to it. Chalk up one more first for the East Germany of the United States.

12 comments:
The more I read into our tax code the more I believe we are no longer a free people.
You're free to run for the Senate. Then if anyone does something that you don't like, you just change the rules on them retroactively.
Remember...there is no law that benefits you more than one you can change on a whim.
(That phrase is probably in Latin on the Schumer coat of arms)
agree with hell-we are not free anymore..the dude will be worth ballpark 4 billion at upper end of range...cant blame him for wanting to save ballpark 40+% especialy if he gets california added to it.senate hasnt passed a budget in 3 yrs but God knows he can get off his ass when it equates to 8 hrs of deficit spending.im sorry but you cant vote some of these pigs out so eventually someone just has to take them out.
excellent update.. chaka fattah was on yesterday basically saying everything your update did.... facebook should GIVE stock to youth movements and shelters because they just should.???????...tom i have 180 nights of prayers...after that i think its just the kel-tec
and now senator casey on.. DUUUFUS...TOM. COME GET MY GUNS....
Jeremiah Wright, Obama Link Could Be Focus Of New Super PAC Campaign
just saw this tom.. so how long before we racist on this ad??? you called it
Chess:
Willie Horton 2.0!
http://youtu.be/Io9KMSSEZ0Y
thanx hell.... dukakis another duuuufus... willie my man....but it has to be done in a way that doesnt turn off potential independent and women votes.. how do i say ---a kneecapping done tastefully.
Chess:
College educated women (especially the single ones) generally vote hard left. The best hope is just to demotivate them from voting at all.
It looks like Obama is going full bore hard left. The gay marriage thing will allow him to raise boku $$$ from Hollywood and other areas that attracts a large number of homosexuals.
I expect that money will be put towards ads that will scare the crap out of the traditional Dem voter (unionized public employees, women, gays, blacks, and anyone dependent on a government check). I expect a lot of ads about how Romney will ban abortion, re-institute slavery, while pushing elderly people in wheel chairs off a cliff.
thanx hell.as always to the point.excellent ho i get shivers calling someone hell. feel like im staring over the river stix with a coin on each eyelid.hmmmmmmmm
haha!
"So baffling, even officials can't explain it"
'even' officials--as if they're the ones who ALWAYS know the right explanations
Post a Comment