I groped a woman I'm not married to last night, and again this morning. (grin) Did I ask her first? No. Did we exercise positive consent? No. Did she in fact say no to me verbally? She did this morning yeah, but I knew she didn't mean it, and she knew I knew it or she wouldn't have said it. If I had tried to stop this morning she would have thought something was wrong.
The fact of the matter is, sometimes no means no, but in many cases no means yes, and on a few occasions, it means 'harder'. This is no secret, and is tied up in the complicated business of being a woman and wanting to be a little slutty, without actually admitting to it. It's really no big deal.
And the reason it's no big deal is that in spite of what she actually said, I obviously had her 'actual consent'. If I didn't, she would not have invited me into her bed last night in the first place.
But those days will be coming to an end soon. Now that the right has firmly embraced the female standard for 'sexual assault', it's all over. Soon there will be a raft of laws saying what men can and can't do, and a long list of legal requirements for relationships, if the man wants to avoid the risk of getting thrown in jail for seducing his girlfriend.
One dark mood, one bad day of PMS, and even years later, you will be subject to the full force of law. Do you trust the woman in your life to be responsible with that kind of power? Do you imagine life will go along normally for you when that's how the world works? The real unwritten rule will be a requirement for all men to meet all women's expectations of them, or be subject to immediate prosecution. This will hold true, even when those expectations are conflicting.
Try dating in that environment.
If you're a heterosexual male, you have to vote Trump, or this is the way the world will work. I'm not being dramatic here. This is already the standard in much of academia, and the man hating blue haired, physically monstrous feminists will see this law implemented 'to protect women', even over the objections of more rational women. There are too many of the former and not enough of the latter.
'Protecting women' from patriarchal 'rape culture' will be the feminist standard of Hillary's America. And ex-post revocation of consent, is what that movement is all about. All it takes is one irrational shameless woman who believes she has something to gain, and your life will be destroyed.
This applies to you married guys too. Suppose you come home one day and find you're wife in bed with the entire front line of the Spanish National Soccer team. You'll want to get divorced of course - who wouldn't. But in the process of getting divorced, your wife will have the option of revoking consent on some past sexual liaison with you, and accusing you of 'sexual assault'. You can then be convicted, and now you're a convicted felon suing for divorce. You won't get the kids. You won't get the house. She will get the gold mine and you will get the shaft.
Or, you can just stay married to her, and let her continue to do what she likes, which is the whole point. You're in a no win situation. That's the Feminist standard of law. Men are guilty, first and always, and anything that happens to the women is never her fault.
Right now you're saying, "my wife would never do that". I think you're wrong (OK, maybe not the soccer team). When you divorce a woman, even a reasonable woman, with good cause, she will turn into the most psychotic creature you'e ever met. She will believe she is perfectly entitled to whatever she can get, and the family courts will see to it she can.
If you don't want to spend your life knuckling under to the will of women, you have to vote Trump and persuade others to do so as well. It's already far worse than you know. and if it goes even an inch further from this, we're all finished.