This is my big problem with the Nevertrumpers. They all claim they are 'principled enough' to not support Trump, but all too often, the hills they choose to die on are the liberal hills of 'racism' and 'misogyny'. Those are not conservative principles, nor is the process of determining guilt or innocence of a person exclusively by the subjective emotional reaction of the offended. But if it's an argument against Trump, they see that as more than principle enough. And don't get me wrong here. My beef is not that they have found common interest with the left on a political question, but that they have embraced the leftist process for determining the 'truth'.
In my opinion, no one who believes a person's guilt or innocence should hang alone on the feelings of the aggrieved, has any business calling themselves a conservative. The process itself is incompatible with the principled conservatism nevertrumpers say they support.